I apologize for the delay in getting past the first team
transfer summary. We are using the
international break for a nice rustic vacation in Maine. I’ve been trying to generally stay away from
the internet, email, and the other things that I tend to use for both my day
job as well as staying up with current events in the Premier League and posting
to the blog. That lasted for a solid 3
days before I felt the pull of the laptop – I guess that’s why I’ve gotten
involved in writing a blog on top of a day job.
As it appears that I’m not going to get to every team, I’m
going to start with the ones that have made the most substantial changes and
move downward toward the ones that didn’t do much toward the end of
window. Since we’ve already covered Arsenal,
I’ll move on to Chelsea.
I LOVED what Chelsea did toward the end of the window. They had the type of window that Arsenal used
to have. Pick up a few very high end
kids and throw in a very strong continental veteran. The difference? The price of the high end kids that used to
be Arsenal’s stock and trade has increased by a factor of about ten since this
was Wenger’s strategy. I don’t know all
the details but my guess is that Chelsea ended up paying Mata and Lukaku (and
their previous clubs) like they were already established stars rather than
rising talents with the potential to be the “next” someone good. The
economics aside, the moves look excellent.
The only downside is that they probably won’t payoff in huge measure for
another couple years.
The Existing Squad
– With Fernando Torres officially dead to the blog, I’m not sure that there is
any value to be had on the Chelsea roster.
Players like Lampard, Malouda, and Drogba seem to be on the downside of
their careers and/or standing to lose playing time to the extent that their
current costs are just too high to justify.
The others – Terry, Luiz, ACole, and Cech – are likely to keep producing
but they priced high enough that you’d certainly never consider them bargains,
especially when they’re allowing bad goals like the ones conceded to Grant Holt
the last time out. The only potential
source of value was Bosingwa but after a strong start to the season his price
has probably climbed to the point where his retail value has caught up with his
potential to produce fantasy points.
Mata – The biggest
question that will present itself to AVB and the powers-that-be at Chelsea will
be what wins out, reputation or current skill/potential. In the case of Mata, this will play out in
where and how soon he’ll play. As strong
as he looked on his debut, his favored spot is occupied by a high-paid veteran
in FloMal. If Mata is flexible enough to
play on the right rather than on the left then it would be hard to see him
sitting on the bench behind Kalou. If he
(or Malouda) can’t adapt to the right side then it will be very interesting to
see how playing time is divided between Mata and Malouda.
Meireles – I have
to admit, I really developed a bit of a soccer crush on Meireles over the
second half of last season. Part of it
was that I picked him up when he was on the rise and stuck with him through his
hot streak. Part of it was just enjoying
the efficient and elegant way he plays in central midfield. As with Mata, the question is one of who he
will be challenging for playing time and what matters more “name brand” or
production. Does Meireles take the spot
currently being “manned” by Ramires who just doesn’t seem to be ready to
compete at the level required of him at Chelsea? Is he an insurance policy
against Frank Lampard continuing to fade? I personally like him better in the
latter role but my guess is that we’re headed for an ugly situation where
Lampard’s ego and long term standing as a Chelsea legend will lead him to be a
starter well beyond the date when that is a benefit to the club. My sense is that Meireles will struggle to
get starts but will look like the better option when he does come in and a lot
of print will be spent throughout the rest of the season wondering what would
have happened if he’d been inserted instead of one of the alternatives.
Lukaku – Not nearly
as much controversy here as with the other acquisitions. If the original Drogba can only get the
occasional start then what chance does the “next Drogba” have until he spends
some time getting settled into the league with guys like Torres, Drogba, and
Anelka ahead of him. AVB showed a
willingness to compromise his favored line-up approach against Norwich by
lining Torres and Drogba up together but it didn’t look any more successful
than Torres did on his own. If the
manager decides to employ multiple traditional forwards in his starting line-up
on a regular basis then Lukaku is at least CLOSER to the starting line-up but
with Mata in place it seems more likely that the starting line-up will feature one
target striker and two wing attackers (from FloMal, Mata, and Kalou) with Mikel
and two of Lampard/Meireles/Ramires backing them up.
Downsides – It is
inevitable that Kalou (just not that good), Anelka (fading), and FloMal will
lose some playing time and therefore some of their value given their current
(high) prices. Ramires isn’t very expensive nor particularly productive so no
real loss to anyone if he loses playing time.
How could u forget sturridge,he's def gonna get a lot of playing time and I'm not sure but can he play rw?in which case mata on the left since malouda is useless
ReplyDeleteAgree with anon and sturridge can play on the right
ReplyDelete- nikhil
sturr up top! drogba and torres useless anyway..
ReplyDeleteThanks for writting
ReplyDelete