Projected Starters - van der Sar, Rafael, Vidic, Rio, Evra, Fletcher, Scholes, Giggs, Valencia, Rooney, Berbatov
In the Rotation - GNev, Evans, Smalling, Fabio, Nani, Park, Carrick, O'Shea, Chicharito, Cleverley, Owen
Kicks - Giggs and Rooney will take the majority of kicks depending on location on the field. If Giggs is out then Nani will likely be replacing him in the line-up as well as in taking free kicks.
Newcomers
- Chicharito, F - He's been quite the sensation over the last 3 or 4 months and his performances in pre-season for United have shown why. He looks to be a dangerous striker who possesses an "it" factor that Berbs just doesn't have. That said, he is likely to start out the season as a late game substitute rather than as a starter. I wouldn't be surprised to see him become a starter later in the season so fantasy managers should track his progress and think about bringing him into their line-ups accordingly;
- Chris Smalling, D - One for the future as ManYoo begin to prepare for life without Rio Ferdinand who is starting to break down physically. Smalling has great potential but is only two years removed from non-league football and is likely no better than the 4th choice center back. If he starts a stretch of matches then things are going wrong in a big way for United but if he is just getting a spot start against inferior opposition to give one of the starters a rest then he might be worth an occasional look;
- Tom Cleverley, M - Another pre-season standout. The question is really how much playing time he can expect to see in the middle of a title chasing campaign. SAF has resisted the urge to loan him out which means that he may see some time but barring an injury to a couple midfielders it seems more likely that his time will be from the substitute's bench rather than in the starting line-up. Still, he's one to watch to see if his pre-season heroics translate into first team and fantasy results;
- Fabio/Rafael, D - I've grouped the twins together perhaps unfairly. Rafael has had much more time in the starting line-up to adapt and he seems ready to assume the first choice role at right back. Fabio, on the other hand, is probably still a year or two away from contributing regularly due to both the presence of Patrice Evra who is one of the top few left backs in the world and the lack of his own experience. With SAF probably preferring to have O'Shea available as a "utility infielder" (for those who don't know baseball that means he can act as a substitute in many positions) I'd expect Rafael to be a solid starter and if that turns out to be the case post-food poisoning then he'll represent nice value at 6.78. The worse case scenario is he and O'Shea (6.73) splitting time with Neville thrown in occasionally and causing fantasy managers to pull their hair out.
- Best - Um, Rooney is the best, second best, and maybe the third best fantasy player on the ManYoo roster. If Giggs gets an extended stretch of games (unlikely) he is probably second;
- Best Value (non-newcomer) - Surprisingly, there are a lot of potential bargains on the United roster to start the season. Rafael is far and away the best value if he turns out to start. Nani and Giggs are also excellent value to start off the campaign if you know when they're going to start;
- Best Projected Value - There aren't a lot of players who are likely to surprise you with their fantasy performances this season because most are veterans but Park and Chicharito are the two that, in my mind, have upside potential and that you should be watching for opportunities to include;
- Worth Considering With Good Match-ups - The ones you know will start...EvdS, Evra, Vidic, Rooney, and probably Valencia;
- Worth Knowing If He's Starting - Rafael, Park, Nani, Giggs, Scholes, Berbs, O'Shea, Fletcher, Chicharito, and maybe Cleverley
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY-TERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR.
ReplyDeleteArticle as expected really. Overlook all that talent and depth, pretend it's mediocrity. If you say so, bub.
the fact that you fail to mantion gibson is amazing. he already has first team experience and showed flashes of brilliance last season. plus he has the ability to hit paul scholes-esque strikes from distance.
ReplyDelete@Anonymous: You cant really argue too strongly though... Fletcher is good but: Valencia vs Ronaldo, nani/current giggs vs giggs of a few years ago, macheda/chicarito vs Tevez, Ferinand + Vidic vs. a younger Vidic + Ferdinand... You cannot claim this isn't one of the worst united squads in years. Still good, but...
ReplyDeleteWow mid-table finish without Sir Alex?
ReplyDeleteMan United's midfield has so much depth it is crazy. The key thing with me is that they work hard defensively which Arsenal's does not. If arsenal's midfield worked as much as fletcher, park etc. they would win the title. Oh and not have almunia in goal.
Cheers,
Not even a United fan
@Joshtottenham
ReplyDeleteMay be one of the worst squads but will win the title.
That is just not only biased, but it totally lacks sense.People like you- always expect Chelsea to win the title which hadn't actually worked out except for last season due to United's drop in form and morale suffered from their CL exit (thanks to Michael Carrick's sincere efforts); you should be a bit more impartial when analyzing teams- even if you are an Arsenal fan.
ReplyDeleteSorry Neal..
ReplyDeleteI think u have it completely wrong. Its Utd's season. I think this is column actually fits well with Chelsea...
Charl
For FF managers like us, whether United wins the title or not isn't the matter. I think Neal is just making the point that United doesn't have that much fantasy value in the midfield. And it is true. There is too much rotation, none of them look like they will score 15+ goals a season and they don't take pks.
ReplyDeleteHaha... it's so biased it's hilarious. Good job guys... I needed a laugh this morning!
ReplyDeleteEvery person claiming it is biased is a biased Man United supporter - grow up kids.
ReplyDeleteWell Josh, seeing how they're the most polarizing team in football most people tend to either hate or love them. If this article is in the spirit of Fantasy and Fantasy only, fine. But in terms of actual football analysis, it's a joke and the majority seem to recognize as such. As for the Spurs fan, actually yes - yes you can argue against it. Many would argue this year's squad is even better than last year's, who was one draw away from retaining a 4th straight title. Sure, Carrick sucks, and yes, Giggs and Scholes are old. But it's not as if Ferdinand was a rock last season anyway, Evans and Smalling are more than capable there. The midfield depth is insane, and without relying on Owen for anything, even if Wazza misses a few more weeks with injuries, call me crazy but between Berbs, Cheech & Kiko I still United's chances just fine. Are they as good as a Drogba or perpetually injured Torres? Probably not. But speaking of age, did ya see how TERRIBLE Terry & Co. looked in Chelski's defence the other day? And they weren't THAT stout last year either... everybody talks about Rooney this, Rooney that, but if Chelsea don't get another herculean effort from Drogba this year, where will they be? Does anyone other than our favourite bloggers REALLY think that Arsenal's youngsters are winning anything this year?? City??? United are just fine, whether people want to see it or not.
ReplyDelete